
Rich Diet Is
Child Neglect and Responsible People
Need to Act
In England,
obesity has been a factor in at least 20 child
protection cases in the last year.1
The British Medical Association (BMA) just
rejected a call for the parents of young obese
children, under 12, to be charged with neglect.2
At this meeting held in Torquay, England on June
25 to 29, 2007, a representative said, “If
parents will not or cannot take responsibility
to provide the right diet and encourage
exercise for their children after
engaging with doctors and dietitians, we believe
that this is a form of child neglect.
If the child's health is at risk they
should be removed from their parents for their
own protection.” In the
end, representatives of the British Medical
Association came to the conclusion that
referring parents to child protection agencies
would "do more harm than good.”
In
ways much more progressive than seen in the US
and most other sophisticated countries,
representatives at this meeting voted by a large
majority to reinforce the BMA's
policy calling for a ban on the advertising of
unhealthy food to children and for
less salt, sugar, and hydrogenated
fats to be added to prepared foods.
How Much Does
Obesity Hurt?
Diet and child
neglect have been topical news. In May of 2007,
vegan parents in Georgia, USA were given a
mandatory life prison sentence after their
6-week-old son, Crown Shakur, died of
malnutrition from a diet of apple juice and soy
milk. Considering the worldwide suffering of
children from starvation, the severity of this
verdict seems somewhat disingenuous. Daily
images of Africa’s starving children evoke
sympathy and we want to and should take action.
Ironically, we fail to see equal pain and
suffering of the children living right under our
own roofs.
Many of you do not
have to imagine the pain of obesity—you have
lived the experience. The humiliation and
discrimination of buying from the plus size
racks and the remarks from high school
classmates are still seered into your memories.
Even though obesity is the most commonly
discussed harm caused by unhealthy eating, it is
not the only one, and not necessarily the most
painful one. The noticeable facial sores from
acne and the hidden worry when bowel movements
come as infrequently as once a week cause
intense hurting—and they are due to diet too.
Scale of Suffering and Pain
(100 points being the most painful.
Feel welcome to change the numbered
scores—these values come from my
experiences and imagination) |
|
|
Starving
to near death |
100 |
Dying of
leukemia |
100 |
Sexual
abuse by an adult |
90 |
Physical
abuse from a parent |
88 |
Verbal
abuse from a parent |
81 |
Testicular
cancer with chemotherapy |
78 |
Obesity
during high school |
74 |
Inflamed
cystic acne |
68 |
Insulin
shots for type-2 diabetes |
66 |
Constipation with BM every 10 to 15
days |
65 |
Anal
fissures and/or bleeding hemorrhoids |
59 |
Precocious
puberty (age 8) |
56 |
Recurrent
abdominal pains |
53 |
4 days of
painful menses each month |
52 |
Recurrent
sore throats and tonsillitis |
51 |
Daily
headaches |
48 |
Moderately
overweight |
46 |
Offensive
body odor |
44 |
Very oily
skin |
41 |
Being
hungry every day |
40 |
Typical
teenage pimples |
37 |
Chronic
fatigue |
28 |
Reduced
athletic performance |
21 |
Mild
irritable bowels (IBS) |
15 |
*These
conditions that involve diet—except for
starvation—are all known to be caused or
suspected of being caused by the Western
diet. (Sexual, physical and verbal abuse
are, of course, not from diet.) |
|
|
Does Intention
Matter?
I believe few
parents would intentionally cause their children
harm. Many do not even recognize there is a
problem within their families. Consider the
findings of this Consumers Reports
survey, “Only 4
percent of survey respondents described their
children as being 20 percent or more above their
ideal weight or obese. But Consumer Reports
found that 19 percent of those children fell in
that category.”3 Epidemic obesity and
sickness are unseen because they are so common
and so close to us that they are considered
“normal” conditions.
Right now the
perpetrators are frequently the “nicest
parents.” Teachers, bankers, ministers,
doctors, and police feed the Western diet to
their children—and most think that the meat and
cheese are good for their children’s muscles and
bones, and the junk is inconsequential.
Genetics, emotional stress, viruses and/or
unknown causes are blamed for their children’s
health problems. Ignorance of the real
consequences of the meals children consume is
the primary reason that this widespread problem
continues. Educated people with some financial
means would be expected to take remedial actions
after learning the truth about how the Western
diet hurts their children. On the other hand,
many families are trapped in poverty, preventing
them from making the right choices even after
they know the truth and want to do otherwise.
(They receive free dairy and meat products from
government subsidy programs. But the McDougall
diet is very inexpensive, but they do not know
this fact.)
Should
unintentional harm be excused? Consider the
parents of Crown Shakur. They did not intend
for their baby to die, but they are still going
to prison. The pain and suffering for the
children is real, regardless of whether or not
the cause is deliberate.
Change Must
Begin Someplace
Until the true
nature of this beast is uncovered nothing will
change. Responsible people must lead and medical
doctors are the logical first step. These
trained professionals witness the direct effects
of the Western diet all day long in their
offices and have opportunities to counsel
parents and children. Innovative medical
education for doctors is a prerequisite for
change, since most doctors are shamefully
unaware. State licensing boards could mandate
classes for re-licensing, just like they now
have classes in pain management, HIV and elderly
care. Like the laws that now require a medical
doctor to report physical abuse of a child to
the proper authorities, laws may be required in
order to fix dietary abuses.
Involvement of the
community with their schools can result in
immediate improvements in health education and
the lunch programs. Big food businesses must be
banned from advertising unhealthy foods to our
children—no honest person could rationalize that
the pain and suffering of even one child from
any one of the conditions in the above box are
worth “free enterprise.” Damaging messages can
soon be replaced by public service
announcements, documentaries and traveling
speakers, spreading the truth about the causes,
consequences, and cures of the diseases of
over-nutrition that plagues our children.
This ubiquitous
source of pain and suffering, even though out of
sight or mind, can no longer be tolerated, because child
neglect and child abuse produce effects that
last a lifetime for that person and spreads a
cancer in any society that turns its back on its
children.
References:
1) Consumers
Report:
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/babies-kids/parents-cant-always-tell
-if-their-kids-are-overweight-survey-finds-7-07/overview/0707_parents-cant-always-tell-if-their-kids-are
-overweight_ov.htm?resultPageIndex=1&resultIndex=2&searchTerm=obesity
2)
Kmietowicz AC. BMA rejects call for
parents of obese children to be charged with
neglect. BMJ. 2007 Jun 30;334(7608):1343.
3)
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/babies-kids/parents-cant-always-tell-if-their-kids-are-overweight
-survey-finds-7-07/overview/0707_parents-cant-always-tell-if-their-kids-are-overweight_ov.htm
?resultPageIndex=1&resultIndex=3&searchTerm=childhood%20obesity |