Moderators: JeffN, f1jim, carolve, Heather McDougall
Way to go with concentrating on the 50/50 plate and finding a way to exercise that is both comfortable and convenient for you.JeffN wrote:While the thought is excellent in theory, it doesn't work in application. As I have mentioned, water is the key to lowering calorie density and also increasing bulk and satiety in foods. However, this is only when the water is part of the food and bound up in the food.
So, if you compare eating a bowl of fresh grapes, with eating a bowl of the equivalent amount of raisins (in calories) and drinking the equivalent amount of water (that would have been in the grapes) the water and raisins combo will not be as filling as the grapes.
The reason is, the water consumed with the raisins leaves your stomach in 5 minutes or so. But, the water that is contained within the grapes as part of the whole matrix, can stay in your stomach for an hour or more.
. . .
You should drink when thirsty.
The code to embed an image looks like thisMark Cooper wrote:I use flickr for my photos. You can get a free account (if you don't already have one) and then upload the images you want to share. For a specific image, if you select the share button, then BBCode, you can just cut and paste the code for the image into a post here on the forum. (You may know all this already, but I thought a quick primer might benefit everyone ).
[img]URL for your picture goes here[/img]
If you are adhering to the rest of the MWL 10-Point Checklist, and seeing consistent weight loss, then don't worry about a preload if it is too much food in one sitting. If you reach a point where your progress stalls, and you still have more weight to lose, you can reevaluate. Give yourself a big for not letting a couple deviations from 100% adherence turn into a binge. If you are interested, Jeff reviews the myth of "starvation mode" in this very enlightening thread.Mark Cooper wrote:When making use of the MWL 10-Point Checklist, please keep in mind that the 10 points are guidelines that highlight areas on which to focus when you are struggling, or not seeing the results you would like. They are not absolute commandments. One example - you aren’t obligated to begin every meal with a salad, but if you find that you are having problems maintaining satiety, starting a meal with salad or soup can be very helpful. The same reasoning holds true for dessert; you don’t have to eat dessert if you are not hungry, but if you do want dessert - choose fruit.
Mark Cooper wrote:
Carrieann - Kudos! You are closing in on those 5000 steps! Are you dealing with some particular issues that your doctor is concerned about? (Please don't feel obligated to answer this question, it it feels too personal.)
Mark Cooper wrote: If you are interested, Jeff reviews the myth of "starvation mode" in this very enlightening thread.
wildgoose wrote:So why do we struggle with fats? I sure did. And periodically I still get this feeling that I’d REALLY like to have something higher in fat. Usually that feeling doesn’t last very long, but there it is.
I understand the inability to "feel full" without eating something higher in fat. I understand never meeting a potato chip I didn't love (fat and salt, what a combination). The other combination that’s so tempting is sugar and fat. It’s Girl Scout Cookie season around here, you know.
Dr. Esselstyn talked in one of his lectures about the fat receptors in the brain. When we're eating the Standard American Diet, full of fat, those receptors are "upregulated." They expect a regular supply of fat to keep them happy. Now we start eating the McDougall/MWL way, and those upregulated fat receptors don’t get their fat supply, and they are not happy at all. They pitch a fit, telling your brain you need to EAT. You don’t feel "full" without that fat. Every tempting fatty snack is screaming your name.
The good news is that those fat receptors will downregulate. They'll get used to the lower fat content of whole natural food. They’ll stop complaining for the most part, and if they do occasionally complain, they’re manageable.
The less-good news is that the downregulation takes a while. At least a couple of months, often a month or two longer. And that’s with excellent compliance.
If you continue to occasionally feed the fat receptors, they’ll still start the downregulation process. After all, you’re still eating a LOT less fat than you used to. But the more fat you eat, the more fat you’ll want, and the more time you’ll need to downregulate. Some people can cut all the added oils right away, some prefer a more gradual approach. For me, it was easier to go all-in and put up with the unhappy fat receptors for a while until they calmed down.
But if you’re struggling with eliminating added oils or other fatty foods from your diet, know that there’s a reason for it, and that you’re not alone. Hang in there.
Goose
wildgoose wrote:So why do we struggle with fats? I sure did. And periodically I still get this feeling that I’d REALLY like to have something higher in fat. Usually that feeling doesn’t last very long, but there it is.
I understand the inability to "feel full" without eating something higher in fat. I understand never meeting a potato chip I didn't love (fat and salt, what a combination). The other combination that’s so tempting is sugar and fat. It’s Girl Scout Cookie season around here, you know.
Dr. Esselstyn talked in one of his lectures about the fat receptors in the brain. When we're eating the Standard American Diet, full of fat, those receptors are "upregulated." They expect a regular supply of fat to keep them happy. Now we start eating the McDougall/MWL way, and those upregulated fat receptors don’t get their fat supply, and they are not happy at all. They pitch a fit, telling your brain you need to EAT. You don’t feel "full" without that fat. Every tempting fatty snack is screaming your name.
The good news is that those fat receptors will downregulate. They'll get used to the lower fat content of whole natural food. They’ll stop complaining for the most part, and if they do occasionally complain, they’re manageable.
The less-good news is that the downregulation takes a while. At least a couple of months, often a month or two longer. And that’s with excellent compliance.
If you continue to occasionally feed the fat receptors, they’ll still start the downregulation process. After all, you’re still eating a LOT less fat than you used to. But the more fat you eat, the more fat you’ll want, and the more time you’ll need to downregulate. Some people can cut all the added oils right away, some prefer a more gradual approach. For me, it was easier to go all-in and put up with the unhappy fat receptors for a while until they calmed down.
But if you’re struggling with eliminating added oils or other fatty foods from your diet, know that there’s a reason for it, and that you’re not alone. Hang in there.
Goose
Return to Maximum Weight Loss Program
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests