Moderators: JeffN, f1jim, John McDougall, carolve, Heather McDougall
Charzie wrote: I can nibble 2 cups popped for under 100 calories, which no matter how I do the math seems more than reasonable and certainly better than chips!
calvin wrote:By the way, the reason popcorn pops up into a white cloud of goodness is rapid expansion of the moisture (uh, that would be like, uh, the opposite of dry?)
viv wrote:Popcorn is a great snack - who says it's not? Dr. McDougall thinks it's o.k. and that's good enough for me. After all it's CORN! Yes one of our wonderful starches to sustain us on our wonderful starchy diet based on potatoes, rice, corn and beans.
Viv
...about only counts in horseshoes. My turn. The calorie density of any given food has nothing to do with the moisture content of that fool. Why? Because water has no calories. Popped corn is no more calorie dense than any other form of corn.landog wrote:calvin wrote:By the way, the reason popcorn pops up into a white cloud of goodness is rapid expansion of the moisture (uh, that would be like, uh, the opposite of dry?)
The moisture leaving the corn is the definition of dry, it is not the opposite of dry.
Corn has more satiety than the popcorn because it retains the water. Popcorn is a calorie dense food. Some people trying to reach their goals may need to avoid calorie dense food.
That's about it...
calvin wrote:The calorie density of any given food has nothing to do with the moisture content of that fool. Why? Because water has no calories. Popped corn is no more calorie dense than any other form of corn.
*https://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/dairy-and-egg-products/74/2
calvin wrote:The calorie density of any given food has nothing to do with the moisture content of that fool. Why? Because water has no calories.
This would increase the calorie density as increased water content is the main factor lowering calorie density.
calvin wrote: The calorie density of any given food has nothing to do with the moisture content of that fool. Why? Because water has no calories.
jeffn wrote:Popcorn is calorie dense and while it does have much more volume than many other foods with the same calorie density because of the air, it is still much easier to overeat on than foods with a lower calorie density. The reason is , most food that is low in calorie density are high in water, which not only provided volume but also weight.
jeffn wrote:So, while a puffed grain, like air-popped corn or rice cakes, or puffed rice cereal is a much better choice than a bread, cracker, dry cereal or bagel, made of the same grain, because of the volume created by the air, it will never be as good as the plan cooked corn, or rice as it does not have the weight provided by the water.
jeffn wrote:Therefore, my recommendation (which may differ slightly then the printed MWL recommendations), is because 1) weight has become such an issue for so many people, and 2) based on my experiences with helping people try to lose weight where so many just find they can and do overeat on these "puffed" products especially popcorn, (unless they portion control them, which is not a principle of MWL), is to avoid them.
If you are including these "puffed" products and the program is working for you and you are at your optimal/ideal weight, then you have my blessings. But if not, you may want to reconsider whether to include them or not.
jeffn wrote:The calorie density is quite a bit higher (& satiety lower)... the main reason is, when you make regular oatmeal, you use 2 cups water for each cup of rolled oats (2:1 ratio of water to oats) and all the water gets absorbed into the oats. The dry rolled oats, even though they are pre-steamed, will never absorb as much liquid.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests