Moderators: JeffN, f1jim, John McDougall, carolve, Heather McDougall
bunsofaluminum wrote:what about the copper non stick? we have one now, and it seems pretty good. Wasn't thinking of chemicals. Going to try it with caramelizing onions, see what happens.
GeoffreyLevens wrote:bunsofaluminum wrote:what about the copper non stick? we have one now, and it seems pretty good. Wasn't thinking of chemicals. Going to try it with caramelizing onions, see what happens.
No idea, never heard of it until now. Copper clad is excellent for even heat transmission but the if bare copper on working surface where the food is not. Copper, like aluminium, is very reactive and will end up in your food. It bioaccumulates and is a risk factor for among other things dementia, here's a link
Copper: Health Information Summary
Probably an ideal set up would be copper bottom and ceramic coating inside.
bunsofaluminum wrote:It isn't clad at all. super cheap, feels like aluminum exterior. copper looking interior, but with a real slick surface that is supposedly impervious to any kind of scratching. Metal utensils, etc. It does clean up super easy. You'll see infomercials for it late night TV. We found it at a "seen on TV" shelf in a regular grocery store.
GeoffreyLevens wrote:Is anodized aluminum cookware better than non-anodized?
Langeranger wrote:Reading Dr. McD's recent newsletter about aluminum, he recommend titanium ceramic. When I went to Williams-Sonoma they told me that titanium ceramic is the coating over an aluminum core. Dumb me, for all I knew the whole thing was titanium ceramic. The WS guy was very knowledgeable, and conveyed the message that all or practically all titanium ceramic cookware is built around aluminum as aluminum is such a good conductor of heat. So is Dr. McD cooking with aluminum shrouded in titanium ceramic or what? I'm ready to buy the WS but don't want to plaque-up my brain too much. J
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests