Moderators: JeffN, f1jim, John McDougall, carolve, Heather McDougall
ctv wrote:Just curious if using wine in cooking is okay. Also I sometimes have a small glass of white wine at special events a couple times a year...is this okay? Thanks!
wade4veg wrote:Indeed, I'd like to see the evidence that drinking a glass of wine (about 5 ounces) each day is harmful..... unless you have a need to more severely curtail calories.
I drink a glass of wine every night.
No indication is is bad ...
roundcoconut wrote:wade4veg wrote:Indeed, I'd like to see the evidence that drinking a glass of wine (about 5 ounces) each day is harmful..... unless you have a need to more severely curtail calories.
I drink a glass of wine every night.
No indication is is bad ...
Not to be a wet blanket, but alcohol is now considered a class 1 carcinogenic, right up there with asbestos, arsenic, mustard gases and tobacco smoking. So clearly, there are people out there who have interpreted the preponderance of the evidence as indicating that a glass of wine a day is harmful to your long-term health.
The data that wine "may actually be beneficial to your health" has been tackled by Dr Greger, who believes that the blood thinner effect of wine, is only desireable if a person is eating a fatty and suboptimal diet to begin with. Someone who eats whole natural foods, no oil, does not improve their cardiovascular health by pouring wine down their piehole.
I may have some of my terminology wrong (I don't think Dr Greger says "piehole"), so feel free to go to the source and not take my word for it. But I wanna make sure we aren't propagating misinformation.
You are free to drink your wine for quality of life, if that is your choice, but when consumed daily, it is not considered to be a charming and harmless substance.
roundcoconut wrote:I'm not sure I really buy the argument that a Twinkie eaten with love, works better for your overall health than a sweet potato eaten with neutral affect.
If that is true, I would expect it to be scalable -- are five Twinkies, eaten with love, better than five sweet potatoes, eaten with neutral affect? What about ten twinkies, eaten with love, versus ten sweet potatoes, eaten with neutral affect?
I can SEE the use of personal preference to fill out the margins of your diet:
If you chop up half a twinkie and sprinkle it on your oatmeal twice a week, is any long-term harm going to result? Prob not.
But the argument that food eaten with love, cannot or will not be processed in the body as an unhealthy substance, sounds like rationalizing. When heart doctors like Esselstyn are working with people with major CVD, they are in tight territory, where eating cheese can very much trigger another heart attack. Cheese is not good for heart patients -- not one piece, not five pieces, not ten pieces.
The body just processes foods in a very particular way. It is biological, not psychological.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests