Moderators: JeffN, f1jim, John McDougall, carolve, Heather McDougall
geoffreylevens wrote:Gramma Jackie wrote:I am a firm believer in modern vaccines. You do have to weigh the risk, but history has shown that the risks of getting diseases is far greater than the risk of having a reaction to the vaccines.
And there's the rub. Some vaccines may be very helpful (with some small but acceptable risk). Unfortunately, the big pharmaceutical companies have, for many years, been using that as a platform to create and market numerous vaccines for diseases that don't really need them, vaccines that do not work as advertised, and most importantly, "damn the public and full speed ahead" using toxic preservatives and adjuvants that have not been adequately tested or are already well known to be very dangerous. It has become up to each of us to do our own research and, as best we can, come to our own conclusions for each vaccine.
Here's a excellent overview:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-10-27/the-united-states-of-hysteria/full/
geoffreylevens wrote:EVERYthing and EVERYone has bias. There no getting around that!
Even the most biased can be correct at times.
geoffreylevens wrote:Unfortunately, as we have seen in the ongoing "debate" about medical insurance, much of the medical profession is controlled by big money interests that do not care about your best interests. Their only concern is profit, and maybe protecting power. Just because a site is "medical" does not mean that its information is complete or accurate. Bias, remember. The key is to ferret out exactly what the bias is in any given situation. That is not necessarily an easy task.
Gramma Jackie wrote:geoffreylevens wrote:Unfortunately, as we have seen in the ongoing "debate" about medical insurance, much of the medical profession is controlled by big money interests that do not care about your best interests. Their only concern is profit, and maybe protecting power. Just because a site is "medical" does not mean that its information is complete or accurate. Bias, remember. The key is to ferret out exactly what the bias is in any given situation. That is not necessarily an easy task.
The medical insurance debate notwithstanding, it doesn't change the fact that at least two types of the accine does not contain maercury.
Gramma Jackie wrote:
The medical insurance debate notwithstanding, it doesn't change the fac that at least two types of the accine does not contain maercury.
You know I just wish I could get on a website once without politics being discussed.
delabeaux wrote:I would say the not touching your face part is the hardest... its amazing how hard it can be and how many little itches you get throughout the day... and how you (I) notice everyone else touching their face.
nonyabizz wrote:delabeaux wrote:I would say the not touching your face part is the hardest... its amazing how hard it can be and how many little itches you get throughout the day... and how you (I) notice everyone else touching their face.
I guess picking your nose is a bad idea, eh?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests