
Comments on My Posthumous Interview with Tim Russert
To my surprise
last
month’s newsletter (June 2008) caused more of a reaction
than any other piece I have ever written. People either
loved it or hated it—nothing in between. By using the
untimely death of the “Meet the Press” host, Tim Russert,
my words came to life—everybody paid attention, but many
people were offended—not by the content, but by the
venue—an interview with a dead man.
Comments I received—some
from people I personally know and respect—talked of
aggravating wounds of fans still in mourning, concerns
for Russert’s family, and my disrespect for religious
beliefs. The clarity of my explanation of the
development of a heart attack was way too threatening
for many people—I removed any reasonable doubt—their
personal diet is an indiscriminate instant killer.
(Two informative YouTube videos of plaque rupture are
found at the end of this discussion. One shows how
heart attacks occur and the other
from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
is on plaque buildup and sudden
blockage.)
The hundreds of reports
that followed his death gave no meaningful answers about
the cause. Russert’s family is entitled to know what
killed him. At least, the truth may prevent Russert’s
son, Luke, from following his dad’s deadly diet. Would
you guess losing a son to be more or less painful than
my newsletter article? At most, my words could prevent
some of the suffering that will follow the 1.2 million
heart attacks expected over the next year in the US
alone. My intention was to enlighten, not to cause anger
or pain.
Once I
came upon the idea of a conversation with this former
prominent public figure, writing it followed quickly and
easily—almost as if it had really happened. Why a
posthumous interview? Because it demanded attention—it
was the biggest rock I could find to throw at the
biggest picture window in town. I was not to be
ignored—not this time—as so many times in the past. All
of your responses were heartening and much appreciated.
After such strong reaction would I write the same
article again? In a heartbeat.

The following comments from readers have
been presented to show both viewpoints on my Russert
Interview:
I
noticed the interview format is a writing technique Dr.
McDougall uses often, and it seems to me it's when he's
explaining the more scientific/physiological information
about his program and how nutrition and the human body
works. I think he uses that format to keep the writing
interesting and entertaining, rather than like a dry
textbook. I noticed it in his Digestive Tune-Up book,
the Second Opinion book, and some of his articles like
this one. I found the characters in the Digestive
Tune-Up book especially humorous and sympathetic. He
creates imaginary characters that ask really good
questions - better questions than I would think to come
up with - but that way you get to the heart of the
matter. He also gives them personality. In this case he
used Russet's personality and an opportunity to reach a
wider audience and teach people. Personally I enjoyed
his Russet interview and my opinion is it's not
offensive or in bad taste. Speaking as someone who was
not really aware of who Mr. Russet was prior to his
death, I feel the article paints Russet in a good light,
just that what he didn't know is what killed him. I also
feel the article does a good job explaining the true
cause of Russet's heart disease, better than what the
mainstream news has done. CV
There
is very important information in this "interview."
However, The interview format is in poor taste. Putting
words into the mouth of the deceased is, in my view,
disrespectful. I was surprised by your decision to
convey your thoughts in this fashion. JDH
It was
with great dismay that I read the following article
about heart disease and Tim Russert's death:
I
can't believe that the author actually put in
writing that Mr. Russert had "done nothing wrong,"
that he "was getting superb medical care" and that
"heart attacks can't always be prevented." I'm
very saddened that this type of information is being
published and read by the American public. No where in
the article does the author reference the results
accomplished through diet and nutrition in regard to
reducing and eliminating heart disease....nor is there
any mention of you, Dr. Neal Barnard, Dr. Dean Ornish or
Dr. T. Colin Campbell. I guess, though, that a
pharmacist's first thought would be to resort to drugs
and, in this case, use the opportunity to sell his
book. It must be so frustrating for you to deal with
this on a daily basis. VW, RN
I just
received and read the article in your most recent
newsletter “A Posthumous Interview by Tim Russert,
Former Host of Meet Press with John McDougall, MD”. I
found it to be incredibly inappropriate and
disrespectful. I understand that your point is to
promote the vegan diet as a means to prevent heart
disease, etc. This certainly could have been
accomplished by an article that discusses the topic,
even through referencing Russert’s case in particular.
However, to write this fake interview comes across as
childish and makes light of his death, while at the same
time blaming Russert himself, who can no longer respond
to such criticism. I can only hope that Russert’s
grieving wife and son never see this. If I, a complete
and total stranger to Russert, am as offended as I am by
this “interview”, I can only imagine what his family
would think.I think that a public apology in your next
newsletter may be in order, perhaps followed by an
appropriate article on the subject of diet and heart
disease. Sincerely, AG
Thank
you for the wonderful Tim Russert piece--it is brilliant
and some of your best writing ever; timely and perfectly
balanced in tone. Great, great job--both my husband and
I love this article. I am a little disturbed at the
negative responses among people on the Forum. I wanted
to say where I think their misunderstanding is:
1.)
They don't understand the needs of good teaching. Both
my husband and myself are educators; we understand what
it takes to educate people beyond what they already
know, and you are doing it brilliantly. For many people
the process of learning something truly new is painful
and difficult. Sometimes you need to 'shock' your
students a bit to get their attention and make the
lesson memorable.
2.)
They don't understand that public figures are public
figures. Many thousands of articles have been published
about Bill Clinton; many hundreds about Tim Russert;
many of these critical or negative. So why is it not
okay for Dr. McDougall to write about these figures?
This point of view is just silly.
3.)
They don't understand the needs of revolutionary change.
You aren't going to change government food policies or
people's ideas about food by being polite and keeping
your head down. Why isn't this obvious? Why, women would
never have gotten the vote if they'd stuck to just
asking politely about it. Some of those suffragettes
were OFFENSIVE. If they were around today, some people
would probably still get the vapors about their
behavior. But politeness alone doesn't change anything.
4.)
They don't seem to understand good science. They let
religious beliefs interfere with seeing clearly.
(Religion shouldn't be incompatible with science at
all.) In my view, religious fundamentalism of all kinds,
Xtian, Islamic, Jewish, etc., is the enemy of progress.
The problem is that fundamentalists claim the right to
define what God "says". Then they judge everything by
their predefined black-and-white logic.
A more
moderate, sensible religious view might be: well, God
gave us eyes to see and a brain to think and a
conscience to use them. So we should do so to the best
of our ability. (I would hope this is how most moderate
religions view it.)
A
skeptical view might be: we evolved eyes, brain,
consciousness and conscience and our creative task is to
see what good we can do with these. I don't see this
view as incompatible with a moderate religious
view--both should be open to investigating the truth.
I've ranted on unnecessarily long. Once again, great
job. I hope you continue to have fun doing this because
it's a wonderful service. A
Wow!
Great newsletter! Using Tim Russert's own books,
interviews, and descriptions from his son to analyze his
risk factors was brilliant!
SM, MD
Using
a fake interview with a dead person is a bit weird. I
say this as someone who loves Dr. McDougall dearly. I
don't think a fan of Tim Russert's would react favorably
to this. I might be wrong (that's happened before) and
I'll know soon if I'm right, I forwarded it to someone
who liked Russert a lot and is upset by his untimely
death. This person is in a position to benefit greatly
from adopting the McDougall lifestyle, too, so I sure
hope this works. It can't hurt…Well, the verdict is in.
The person I forwarded this to is really ticked off,
thought it was in poor taste and used bad words. Maybe
I'll let him cool off for a while...... and go eat some
potatoes. Mrs. D
Great
edition of the newsletter, especially the "interview."
Wow! As usual, you really lay it all out there.
Powerful video clips too. Thanks for writing about such
an important subject with hard-hitting clarity. RB
Heaps
of thanks for an eye-opening newsletter. The posthumous
'interview' with the lately lamented Tim Russert was
riveting, captivating, and necessary as a spur to all of
us who are loping about with pinhead pustules with
hidden agendas. PR
Congratulations on a fabulous and creative job of
seizing the opportunity with the Russert interview. JP
I was
almost convinced that you actually might have some
credibility until I read your June Newsletter in which
you interviewed Tim Russert. Did you have some type of
authorization from his family? The entire article was in
poor taste and lacked any sense of respect. Additionally
I would appreciate some reputable references on your web
site which are a little more current than the 1980's. As
a medical professional who has long been a proponent of
complimentary health and preventative health care I
would appreciate a little more medical science than just
your conjectures from some rat studies. I am afraid your
are just trying to make a few dollars on the backs of
hard working people. Count me out. MS MD
(PS
from McDougall – you need to read my current writings
like the newsletters and star mcdougallers for updated
references.)
Loved
your Tim Russert interview. I was wondering when you'd
be making a comment about this famous fatality. As soon
as I heard of his death, I figured (rightly) what the
culprit was and how tragic it was that a simple change
of diet could have saved this beloved man. I have a
question about the "large bulges inside the arteries,"
that are "old, large, fibrous, calcified plaques." You
say that they are not fatal, but what effect do they
have on a person's life? I've been following your
program for several years now after spending a
wonderful/life-changing ten days in Santa Rosa. I
suspect that I have those calcified bulges, "stable as a
rock." I'm not worried about them. I'm just wondering
what I can do to compensate for their presence. Do they
restrict my blood flow? With healthy arteries, is there
a natural dilatation that takes place? Have you written
about this subject? Thank you. JB
Dr.
McDougall, I forgot to mention — what a great idea to
use the interview format! Was it your idea? Best to you,
MO
Now
you have supernatural powers. I didn't see that one
coming! JH
I am
writing because I have followed your plan for years and
have had a great deal of respect for you - until today.
This ridiculous interview with Tim Russert is soooo
unnecessary, sooo over-the-top and so incredibly
disrespectful that I am appalled and surprised. Russert
was tending to his cardiac condition, albeit, most
likely, too little - too late; however, I, too, am a
healer and this interview blames the patient, a dead one
no less. This blame gets nowhere with those who truly
need direction and help. Of course, we need to take
personal responsibility for our well-being, but what
does it serve you or the community to denigrate a dead
man who was, in fact, doing his best as he knew it. The
interview is overwhelmingly childish and an apology to
your readers and patients is called for, as well as an
apology to the Russert family. Also, it's a good idea to
get your facts straight before you go ahead and accuse a
deceased person of being personally guilt of his own
demise. Sincerely, SR, N.D., D.D. CtTFT
This
is a great read. It forces one to look at their
hardened beliefs. One comment (I mean no disrespect):
You say the stress is good for us — it motivates us. I
too have been called an outsider, etc. and I say there
is nothing good about stress except to alert us that we
are doing something wrong inwardly and/or perhaps
outwardly. Why should one need stress to be motivated?
Isn't it analogous to being motivated by pain as if one
is a slave being beaten to be motivated? I wrote a small
handbook on seeing through the stress hoax — it is a
hoax! Perhaps as believing we need animal products is a
hoax. Thanks again for your insights, MO
Wow!
The posthumous interview was a brilliant idea. I am
forwarding it to my sickly parents -- perhaps it will
motivate them to change. They watch CNN at least 16
hours per day and have no doubt been following all the
stories on unfortunate Tim Russert. Thank you for taking
the time to write this article. Best regards, DL
Your
article is a brave effort to educate the American
public—and perhaps a few physicians. I have forwarded it
to several people and almost immediately heard from one
of them: “Sara - very interesting, and a brave effort on
the part of Dr. McDougall. I will share this with some
friends. Thank you. John. SD
Once
again you hit a home run way out of the ball park. If
the investigative journalists don't take up your call,
then they are pathetic. Fabulous, well researched,
possibly world changing piece. Congratulations. AE
Your
posthumous interview with Tim Russert blew me away. Not
the information--I've been a fan of yours for years--but
the excellent way you presented the information. You are
so creative and this piece was done extremely well.
There is no clearer communicator of health information
in the world today than you are, Dr. McDougall, and I
think I'm familiar with all the people who are telling
the truth. Thank you for inspiring me even more. I tend
to get careless about how much fat I allow in my diet
and this article set me back on track. I appreciate you
and Mary more than you could ever know. SB
Your
Russert interview is dynamite, both brilliant and
superb. It is caring and thoughtful with the wake up
call of an earthquake. I don't see how conventional
care will go after you but they will. Count me as an
ally in your defense and feel free to use the enclosed
example as proof that your approach works. Great Job!
Es
The
interview is brilliant! BRILLIANT! NT
50
pounds down on McDougall living, 40 to go.
This
is great information, but it was done in VERY poor
taste. SG
Thank
you so much for the free newsletter! You would be
interested to know that the death of Tim Russet was the
alarm clock sounding for me. I was very receptive to
anything I've read about cardiovascular issues. I've
read an Internet article about his death, and it had
comments from readers, and one comment said that if Tim
only knew the information found in "Prevent and Reverse
Heart Disease" he would have still been alive. So that
started the course I am now on. If that reader only knew
how great of impact his comment made. Because is not
only me know, but my family, relatives and friends. G.
This
interview with Mr. Russert in the newsletter is
extremely distastful. You should be ashamed of
yourself! Poor taste!!! MER
THIS
NEWSLETTER WAS SO WONDERFUL! THANK YOU FOR ALL YOU DO. I
HAVE FORWARDED IT TO ALL MY "MEAT-EATING" FRIENDS WHO
THINK I AM NUTS. JV
This
is THE greatest newsletter you ever put out. I have been
going over and over the Tim Russet interview with the
YouTube visual for the last 2 hours.
It is
so compelling (and have heard the lecture twice at the
Costa Rica
Adventures) It is exactly the reinforcement that I need
right now. MB
Brilliant! I am very proud of you! :>) RC
One of
the reasons I found my way to Dr. McDougall is because I
interviewed so many doctors and RD's that the "truth"
became obvious many years ago. As I remained the only
healthy person as I watched my family succumb, sometimes
fatally, to disease, I kept coming back to these truths
that were so self-evident. When I tried to do the
stories that needed to be told, I was often told by
management, "they're just quacks," and the interviews
died on the editing room floor. While Dr. McDougall has
always written some of the most to-the-point newsletters
I've seen, the Russert piece really nails it. As a
doctor, his words have more clout, and I'm sure hoping
this time, the current crop of investigative reporters
will do their jobs and get to the bottom of this. But
with fewer and fewer media outlets having the bucks to
stay alive, and those that survive are fed by the
corporate giants, my optimism about that is pretty
bleak. Carry on with all your good work and message, Dr.
McDougall, and everyone else. Never underestimate your
impact! EJJ
Thank
G-d for your frank and no nonsense editorial on the sad
and untimely passing of Tim Russet! Those of us
following "your way" have come to know on a personal
level just how much what you say not only makes good
sense, but IS the REAL DEAL!! I have forwarded this
information to my kids and their spouses in hopes that
something in it will spark them to "clean it up". My
son in law, 44, has already had a stent put in (2 years
ago!) and both his parents died of massive heart attacks
at 63!! I am going to see if I can get him to go to the
next advanced study weekend as I see you will be
addressing hearts and the medicines that give
unrealistic hope. Thank you for all you do!!
Respectfully, MM
I
thought your piece about Tim Russert (and Bill Clinton)
were excellent and agree that it is strange that not
once, other than you, have these issues been raised.
Best regards, AD, Ph.D.
Wow!
John, this could be the most effective piece you have
ever written. Not only is it re-challenging me to do
better, but I am committed to be sure that many of my
friends have an opportunity to read it. move late, BB
What a
brilliant and clever way to educate the masses -- and
medical community -- regarding atherosclerosis. I must
say, a pure stroke of genius. Keep up the wonderful
work. Warmest regards, GB
As
usual, TERRIFIC piece. That's the Russert posthumous
interview. One of these days someone like him will
delve, even lightly, but just maybe in time. As always,
I doff my cap to ye. Your friendly Africanist, AG
Using
a fake interview with a dead person is a bit weird. I
say this as someone who loves Dr. McDougall dearly. I
don't think a fan of Tim Russert's would react favorably
to this. I might be wrong (that's happened before) and
I'll know soon if I'm right, I forwarded it to someone
who liked Russert a lot and is upset by his untimely
death. This person is in a position to benefit greatly
from adopting the McDougall lifestyle, too, so I sure
hope this works. It can't hurt…Well, the verdict is in.
The person I forwarded this to is really ticked off,
thought it was in poor taste and used bad words. Maybe
I'll let him cool off for a while...... and go eat some
potatoes. Mrs.
I
think mr. russert would very much enjoy the direct
interview format. well done. not so sure about some of
that video. B
I
thought it was very clever. It made me chuckle. It got
the point across. Might it offend Russert fans? Maybe.
But so would the diet information! C
I
agree, in fact I had already emailed Dr. McDougall's
interview to Lou Dobbs and Brian Williams. I don't know
if they will ever read it, but just maybe they will. I
am trying to send it to Chris Mathews as well. By the
way, I'm also using, or I should say my wife is using
some of the recipes from the Cancer Project. Thanks. C
After
Tim died you were understandably upset about how a
person could have a "negative" stress test a month
before succumbing to a massive heart attack. John
explains all of this very well below in a way that
honors what we all appreciated most about Tim Russert.
ML
Very
good interview! I am posting it on my blog tomorrow. I
also posted it on my blog at The Ellsworth American.
Thanks, MW
I
wasn't necessarily a Russert fan, but I did find the
"interview" in poor taste. I completely understand the
point Dr. McDougall was trying to make - one that I
agree with completely - but it just rubbed me the wrong
way. Speaking ill of the dead, I guess? I'm curious if
others had this reaction. E
Wow!
Your article on Tim Russert is EXCELLENT, and SCARY!
Thank you so much! The video is awesome. Did you send
your article to Brian Williams and other news media?
Take care, LS
Great
article with the Tim Russert interview.. I passed it
along to many others including several MD's in hopes
that they will question their own diets. JC
Your
mock Tim Russert interview was brilliant. I will be
passing it along to everyone I care about. Many thanks,
BP
The
newsletter is fantastic. I loved the Tim Russert
piece--They should run that in the NY Times and the
Washington Post. The day Russert died I said to my
husband, “They need to call John McDougall and he can
tell them exactly why Tim Russert died.” Thanks for the
great recipes from Celebrity Chef weekend--they sound
yummy. CB
I
thought your Tim Russert 'interview' was excellent and
creative. MS
Excellent job on the Russert article in the latest
newsletter. Your Q & A presentation was the perfect
choice; easy to read and entertaining. My husband, Jim,
and I will be coming to September’s Advance Study.
Looking forward to seeing you! W
I am
sure that you will be criticized for your interview with
Tim Russert, but I admire you for the guts you have in
telling it like it is. How many Americans could be saved
by a simple diet change? Countless numbers. I believe
that one day the Lord will have an accounting of those
who could have made a difference and didn't. DP
That
was a superbly crafted posthumous interview with Tim
Russert. Thanks for being. Cheers, E
I have
been receiving your e-mails for some time now but I was
shocked when I read your posthumous interview of Tim
Russert. This was just the most insensitive article the
Russert family could ever read. (I hope they don't!)
While I agree with the health facts about heart
disease, it was crude to mention all the "unclean" meats
in such a nasty way that Tim may or may not have eaten
in his lifetime. We must be kind in trying to encourage
people toward a better lifestyle--even doctors don't
know good nutrition.This article also promoted
spiritualism - communicating with the dead and expecting
an answer. The dead sleep in the grave and know nothing
that is going on on this earth or under the sun. They
await the return of Jesus when the dead in Christ will
arise first, then those who are alive in Christ will be
caught up and meet them in the air with Jesus where they
will be with him in heaven. Why would Jesus say he's
coming again if all of the saints are already in heaven?
This latest article makes me want to consider
unsubscribing to your newsletter but I will wait for an
apology which I expect many readers will want also. NS
I just
read the July newsletter article on Tim Russert and
while what you said is all true, I was really offended
by the format you chose to present it. I don't think it
was in good taste. CA
I just
read your letter/interview with Tim Russert and I
laughed/cried. The sad part is where you hit the nail on
the head "The question is: even if you had known better,
would you have changed?" With my WOW NOW System, where
we teach people how to go about healthy eating, we find
this to be the case. Even when presented with evidence
and understanding, some won't make the change, even to
save their life. I love what I do and I am often called
outspoken, direct and honest as I share with passion my
message of health and life. Traits you and I share! LOL
I make no excuses and call it as I see it, with
compassion and love. It is always nice to know that we
are not alone! There are others fighting the same fight,
walking the same path and setting the same example.
Thank you for your courage, humor and example. Love ya!!
S
Your
interview with Tim Russert is the most creative and
acutely interesting form of education I have ever seen.
My heart felt congratulations. You did it again. Ever so
appreciative. H
WELL
DONE! WHAT AN HONOR TO KNOW YOU AND MARY MY REGARDS
HB
From
the moment I heard of Tim Russert's death I wondered
about his diet. He was 58 and I, 53 (54 as of
yesterday) - a little too close for my comfort.
Thank
you for your interview. I hope it makes an issue of
diet over meds. I will see that those I know will read
this.I took the time to view all of the video clips that
you included with your interview. Thanks for your
newsletter. Your Celebrity Weekend I am sorry I missed.
JB
I have
always found the information in your newsletter very
helpful. However, I think the article about Tim Russert
is in very poor taste with a VERY high yuck factor. You
are better than this. NW
Your
posthumous interview with Tim Russert was outstanding
and so needed. A photo of Russert and his family in
Italy, just days before his death, evidenced how sick he
was. He looked awful - puffy, tired and strained. Here
we have the brightest lights in journalism, privy to the
latest information in so many arenas, and self-care
appeared at the bottom of their priority
list. Hopefully, someone there will read your article
and give pause. I'm in the process of writing Andrea
Mitchell of NBC to share not only my grief at Russert's
untimely death, but to encourage reflection on how her
colleagues are caring for themselves. His loss might
resurrect attention on the relationship between
nutrition and disease. As always, the very best to you
and Mary and thanks for all you do. JI
Your
interview with Tim Russert is a classic. I have already
forwarded a copy to my e-mail list. RA
I
found your article “A Posthumous interview by Tim
Russert” amazing and so affirming of the changes we have
made and are making to live a healthy life. Thank you
for your expertise, excellence and education that you
have provided us with. We will be forever grateful! Warm
regards, CF
Great
newsletter on Tim Russert. Just a week before he died I
watched him on his show and thought, wow, here's a guy
that won't be around much longer. Very sad. K
Bravo
on your treatise of the creative interview with Tim
Russert, in the New York Times, which I read daily.
Let's face it...he was fat. Probably obese. He ate
horribly. His doctor's explanation of what happened was
a joke, even to me, a reasonably knowledgeable layman. I
still agree with your view on the importance of what we
put in our stomachs. No debate there. I know how you
feel about exercise, and much of your thinking I can
concur…HK
So
very valuable! Your idea, just like your Bill Clinton
letter, is such an effective way to get the message
across. You are my medical "god here on earth." So many
thanks to you, and to your wife. Your efforts are
appreciated, and are saving millions of lives --
millions of family members are affected. Too bad that
such an intelligent person, like Tim Russert, was not
able to ask this important health question, and get the
simple answer. Again, I thank you, so very much, for
your intelligence and efforts! RB
Thank
you, I will give it a real try. BTW, I loved the
Russert "interview" -- a bold approach, but effective,
at least here! PM
Thanks
for printing the "interview" with Tim Russel. I loved
Tim Russelts show and really enjoyed his news casting.
I am one of the viewers that will definitely miss his
work on television. Thank you so much for printing this
information. I am going to mail it to all of my
relatives--especially the ones that still eat S.A.D but
think that they are eating healthfully! This is how my
husband died as well. I also think it would be most
helpful if Tim's doctor would have put more emphasis on
Tim's diet when being interviewed by Andrea Mitchell.
The doctor certainly cited stress as one of the
culprits. Why not pinpoint the major culprit and use
this as a learning experience for the American
public--don't eat the S.A.D. There are a lot of stress
factors that most people in America really can't
control, but diet is something that everyone has total
control over. Could it really be that simple? YES!! LB
I read
the article in your last newsletter concerning a
Posthumous Interview with Tim Russert. I thought that
this unique presentation was extremely informative. I
have read many of your articles concerning diet,
cardiovascular problems and many other ailments. This
article really pulled all key aspects of your numerous
articles together in an outline fashion conhttpcerning diet,
heart attacks, CAD, etc..The heart attack suffered by
Tim Russert struck close to home because of the
similarity to the coronary event that I experienced
about 21months ago. Like Tim I was 58 when I suffered a
heart attack, also in the anterior portion of my heart,
no previous warning as with Tim, all physicals were
normal as with Tim, followed an exercise program as with
Tim, cholesterol & blood pressure were under control as
with Tim and paid no attention to diet as with Tim.
After hearing about Tim Russert's heart attack I realize
even more how extremely lucky I was to have survived. I
am so grateful that God let me survive the event that I
experienced and soon afterwards directed me to an
article by Dr. John McDougall in a Bottom Line's
publication. KC
When
news commentator Tim Russert died suddenly two weeks
ago, I was shocked and saddened. My husband and I looked
forward to watching Tim on NBC and MSNBC. He was as
sharp as a tack and was so pleasant and fun to listen
to. We were living in Florida in 2000 when Tim got us
through election night with his “white board.” Then we
moved to Ohio and there was Tim again, explaining the
election in 2004 in terms we could all understand. I’ll
miss his enthusiasm. I was hoping you would comment
about his death from heart disease in your newsletter.
The format you used of a posthumous interview certainly
caught my attention! Thanks again for your article. SJ
Your
article in the new newsletter, interviewing a posthumous
Russet is masterful. RO
I'm a
subscriber to your newsletter. I get a lot of useful
information from it. However, I thought your
posthumous "interview" with Tim Russert was in poor
taste. You've got a good message and you tell it well in
your own words. Please stay away from the cheap
gimmickry. AB
I am
still grieving Tim Russert. I appreciate both your
article on him, and your compassion for Mr. Clinton. So
many people took that too politically. I also think he
has many excellent qualities. (I just emailed authors my
comment, "What Does This Say About Our Values? That more
people - and more viciously - condemned President
Clinton for making love than they did President Bush for
making war.") Anyway, I appreciate some compassion shown
two great people who ate poorly. VP
I
didn't get to see this until just now as I have been on
a long-awaited vacation with my family and only
sporadically in touch with e-mail. But I must tell you
that this 'interview' is more than brilliant. There are
no adjectives that could do justice! CC Ph.D.
Bravo
on your Russert article! Regards, DC
WOW!
Great job on that interview. I especially liked your
comments on stress and exercise. I hope that you will
make it to Oprah's show. DN
Your
"Posthumous Interview with Tim Russert" was out of place
and extremely tactless. I am a 73 year old vegan (5'8
and 130 pounds), and I am not religious. Nor do I watch
CNN or "Meet the Press", but prefer my news from New
York Times, Washington Post, The Guardian and BBC World
News. However, I have seen clips of Russert's most
famous
interviews over the years and liked his style.
Considering the loss in the TV News commentaries field,
and the genuine grief among his peers, not to mention
his family - and I understand he was a real family man
- I find your e-mail extremely inappropriate and rash.
As a vegan - mostly raw food - I agree with all your
points, but strongly object to the format you put it in.
Sincerely, AE
Your
“interview” with Tim Russert is as hard hitting as I’ve
ever read. PE
Yes,
your Tim Russert interview was fantastic. I have more to
say on it after I've read it some more. I've read it
three times and each time it has more meaning. The
interview belongs in a book. LM
You
know that I respect your work and I also believe that
you care about people. As you probably saw from my post,
I was surprised when I read this "interview" with Tim
Russert. The thing that concerns me the most is that I
don't feel you thought of the feelings of the Russett
family if they read this, at this point in time.
Grieving is an intense and highly sensitive state
(especially when the death is sudden) and this just
seemed too soon to write something of this nature.
People almost always naturally feel a sense of guilt
when someone dies, so why put more on them of what
"could" have been, when nobody really knows this? Plus,
it just seemed like a strange format, especially to
people who don't know you or who don't understand
vegetarianism. If you don't mind, could you please
explain? The post wasn't easy for me to write, and
neither is this email. But you've always been honest
with me, and I am being honest with you. With complete
respect to you and everything you stand for, this
article seemed out of context to me. Thanks for
listening. Cordially, K
Thank
you for the article you wrote about Tim Russert.
Someone needed to say what you said. In the days after
his passing, I was so incredibly frustrated at the news
broadcasts and doctors coming on TV saying that he had
done "everything right" to help himself. I wanted to
scream at the TV screen! He did not do what he should
have done, and now we've lost a great guy. :-(
How
about the interview posthumously with Tim Russert by
McDougall. Fantastic! That should be made into a film,
DVD and distributed widely. HD MPH, CNS, FACN
Thank
you so much for your awesome "interview" with Tim
Russert. Kudos to you for such an informative and
cleverly written piece!!! You did hit the nail on the
head when you asked, "if you had known, would you have
changed your diet?" Unfortunately, in many cases the
answer is "NO! I like what I like and you only live
once!" Respectfully, JS
The
posthumous interview with Tim Russert should be required
reading for all obese, sedentary older Americans...
Eye-opening. I made the switch from omnivore to low-fat
vegan more than a year ago. BD
Thank
you for your piece on Tim Russert. As soon as we saw the
interview with his doctor, we were anxiously awaiting
your response. Excellent. Have forwarded it to everyone
we know. LS
Your
posthumous interview with Mr. Russert was excellent! I
only wish it could be published in every newspaper and
magazine and be read on CNN! J
Your
article on Tim Russert in the last newsletter was
wonderful and I've been passing it along to many people,
who in turn are passing it along. It was filled with
many incredible arguments that are real eye openers. VV
What a
clever way to get across a strong, concise,
informative message! I sent it to family and friends.
Thank you again for your work. You are indeed my hero.
It is very unlikely that Mom Roseberry at age 93, three
years on your plan, would still be with us without your
work. This week, she had her pacemaker/defibrillator
replaced because her old implant had a used up battery.
I imagine it was not needed. She is now on no
medication other than baby aspirins. Amazing in the
Western diet era. Thank you, sincerely. T
Two More Graphic Examples of Plaque
Rupture
You
can find additional comments and add your own at my
discussion board under the heading, “Comments on the
latest newsletter and star mcdougaller. |