Moderators: JeffN, carolve, Heather McDougall
geo wrote:If a person is 100% healthy, is in the healthiest BMI range, follows the lifestyle protocols suggested here (an MWL style diet), along with your guidelines, principles and recommendations, (dietary, exercise, mentally, socially, etc) would there be any reason to also practice fasting (in any of its forms, i.e. intermittant, short term, long term, etc...)?
Is there any science that says the body could use some form of "rest from eating" despite being in optimal health and following an optimal lifestyle? I know the healthy body can always deal with such a situation as fasting, but does it, as the old commercial saying goes, do a body good, if that body is already in optimal condition?
I believe I've read that you did or used to do some fasting? Did you find it worth while?
geo wrote: Thank you Jeff! Pretty much what I was expecting. Though lots of questions remain, such as:
1. Is fasting better or more efficient at returning a body to propr metabolic functioning than say the MWL with your guidelines..
geo wrote:2. Whats the best way to refeed following the fast and how quickly to jump into a more permanent plan?.
geo wrote:My gut feeling is that in the long run. Sticking to a far simpler MWL plan with your guidelines from the get go gets a person started quicker into the lifestyle (rather than doing a fast and then once again switching to some refeeding schedule that is temporary but progressive before settling into something more permanent) and lets them be more comfortable with the changes and better able to stick with it. And ultimately, will make one more successful. .
geo wrote:I can see, for the extremely obese/sick where time is of the essence that a fast may be whats needed to quickly bring the body back under some control. Much in the same way Dr Kempner did using his phased approach.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests