Responses to the NEJM MED Diet Study **UPDATED**

A place to get your questions answered from McDougall staff dietitian, Jeff Novick, MS, RDN.

Moderators: JeffN, carolve, Heather McDougall

Responses to the NEJM MED Diet Study **UPDATED**

Postby JeffN » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:16 pm

Three responses to yesterdays news about the study on the MED Diet.

In Health
Jeff

1) From Dr McDougall

http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2013other/news/oil.htm

2) From Dr Esselstyn:

Misleading Research

The New England Journal of Medicine article entitled Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet is misleading and inappropriately titled. It should read Promotion of Cardiovascular Disease with a /Mediterranean and Control Diet.

All three dietary groups had almost equal facility promoting the growth and clinical appearance of cardiovascular disease in those who at study onset did not have this illness. The single exception was the control group which had a significantly higher stroke rate; however at baseline, they also appeared to have a greater BMI, waist circumference, hypertension, anti hypertensive agents and diuretics suggesting a cohort at greater risk for strokes.

Earlier this month the British Medical Journal updated the randomized Sydney Heart Study, which confirms the findings of this present Spanish study that the addition of oils worsened the outlook for cardiovascular disease.

By way of contrast, our small plant based nutrition study (devoid of 10 food items contained in the Spanish Study Control diet group known to injure endothelial cells) took patients with established advanced cardiovascular disease and not only halted disease progression but was able to demonstrate disease reversal. We will shortly publish an expanded version confirming our original findings.

The epidemiological ultimate confirmation of the power of plant based nutrition to prevent cardiovascular disease is best demonstrated in T. Colin Campbell’s China Study. In a rural province in China over a three year period examination of over 250,000 death certificates, not one death was attributable to cardiovascular disease.

3) My Response

Yesterdays headlines in the NY Times Health section read, "Mediterranean Diet Shown to Ward Off Heart Attack and Stroke."

The article states, "About 30 percent of heart attacks, strokes and deaths from heart disease can be prevented in people at high risk if they switch to a Mediterranean diet rich in olive oil, nuts, beans, fish, fruits and vegetables, and even drink wine with meals, a large and rigorous new study has found."

They were reporting on a study that was published in the New England Journal of Medicine where that randomly assigned 7,447 people in Spain who were overweight, were smokers, or had diabetes or other risk factors for heart disease to follow a Mediterranean diet with added olive oil, a Mediterranean diet with added nuts, or a low-fat diet.

Since this study is getting so much attention this week, let's take a closer look at the study.

To me, this is a great example of a study that is being misrepresented by both the researchers & the media. The flaws in the way it is being reported are enormous and only further my concerns about how media misrepresents health info & how researchers can promote conclusions that are not supported by their work.

Here are some of the problems with the study;

- The low fat group was not low fat at all as they consumed a diet that was 37% fat.

- In addition, the reduction in fat they experienced over the course of the study was only from 39% to 37% fat, a 2% reduction. Not only was the group not low fat, they experienced a non-significant reduction in total fat.

- The authors knew from the very beginning that the group they were calling low fat would have poor compliance and they actually stated that in an earlier paper on the same study and diet

"Limitations of the study

Fat consumption is customarily high in Mediterranean countries. Due to this fact, some participants have difficulty in following a low-fat diet on the long-term. We acknowledge this limitation because participants in the low-fat diet Control group belong to a Mediterranean culture and their food habits are derived from the fat-rich traditional MeDiet (Serra-Majem, 2007)."


- In spite of knowing this and the difficulty the low fat group would have in complying, the low fat group received virtually no support at all in following this diet during the first half of the study.

- The low fat group was also encouraged to consume refined grains & carbs and even sugary drinks (like sodas).

- The low fat group still consumed fatty dairy & meat.

- In addition, as reported on the 1, 3, and 5-yr follow-up diet scores, the 2 experimental groups (the olive oil and nut groups) consumed a "statistically significant" greater amount of legumes, vegetables and fruits and less butter, cream and margarine than the control group (the low-fat group). The experimental groups also consumed less commercial bakery products on the 1 and 3-yd follow ups than the control group.

- While I do not think funding itself is always an issue, this study was not well done, is being misrpresented & the funding sources of the lead authors sounds like the marketing team for the MED travel & tourism bureau.

- The two MED diet groups were encouraged to include sources of omega 3 fatty acids which are known to be heart healthy. On the other hand, the low fat diet groups was discouraged from consuming sources of the essential fat omega 3's. This may turn out to be the real difference that mattered in this study, as neither olive oil nor nuts (which are being promoted as the difference that mattered) are a significant source of Omega 3's

- There was no significant difference for most all outcomes including heart attacks (myocardial infarction), death from cardiovascular causes, or death from any cause. The only significant difference was for stroke, which is not surprising considering the emphasis on omega 3s in the 2 experimental groups.

- The absolute differences between the groups was not great and it could be viewed that all groups experienced somewhat similar rates of disease. So another way to look at it is that all 3 high fat MED diets produced similar rates of disease but the groups that emphasized healthier foods and more omega 3's, experienced a little less disease. They were also more at risk for stroke from the beginning.

- The conclusion of the study should be that they found a significant reduction in stroke in those consuming a Mediterranean diet encouraged to be higher in omega‑3 fatty acids and healthier foods when compared to those who were not making these same changes in their diet.

That is not new news and should have been expected and does not in anyway compare to the results we see with our programs.

In Health
Jeff

Lead Authors and Funding Sources

Dr. Estruch reports serving on the board of and receiving lecture fees from the Research Foundation on Wine and Nutrition (FIVIN); serving on the boards of the Beer and Health Foundation and the European Foundation for Alcohol Research (ERAB); receiving lecture fees from Cerveceros de España and Sanofi-Aventis; and receiving grant support through his institution from Novartis.

Dr. Ros reports serving on the board of and receiving travel support, as well as grant support through his institution, from the California Walnut Commission; serving on the board of the Flora Foundation (Unilever); serving on the board of and receiving lecture fees from Roche; serving on the board of and receiving grant support through his institution from Amgen; receiving consulting fees from Damm and Abbott Laboratories; receiving consulting fees and lecture fees, as well as grant support through his institution, from Merck; receiving lecture fees from Danone, Pace, AstraZeneca, and Rottapharm; receiving lecture fees and payment for the development of educational presentations, as well as grant support through his institution, from Ferrer; receiving payment for the development of educational presentations from Recordati; and receiving grant support through his institution from Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, Nutrexpa, Feiraco, Unilever, and Karo Bio.

Dr. Salas-Salvadó reports serving on the board of and receiving grant support through his institution from the International Nut and Dried Fruit Council; receiving consulting fees from Danone; and receiving grant support through his institution from Eroski and Nestlé.

Dr. Arós reports receiving payment for the development of educational presentations from Menarini and AstraZeneca.

Dr. Lamuela-Raventos reports serving on the board of and receiving lecture fees from FIVIN; receiving lecture fees from Cerveceros de España; and receiving lecture fees and travel support from PepsiCo.

Dr. Serra-Majem reports serving on the boards of the Mediterranean Diet Foundation and the Beer and Health Foundation.

Dr. Pintó reports serving on the board of and receiving grant support through his institution from the Residual Risk Reduction Initiative (R3i) Foundation; serving on the board of Omegafort; serving on the board of and receiving payment for the development of educational presentations, as well as grant support through his institution, from Ferrer; receiving consulting fees from Abbott Laboratories; receiving lecture fees, as well as grant support through his institution, from Merck and Roche; receiving lecture fees from Danone and Esteve; receiving payment for the development of educational presentations from Menarini; and receiving grant support through his institution from Sanofi-Aventis, Kowa, Unilever, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Karo Bio.
User avatar
JeffN
 
Posts: 9413
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:56 am

Return to Jeff Novick, RD

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


cron

Welcome!

Sign up to receive our regular articles, recipes, and news about upcoming events.