Moderators: JeffN, f1jim, carolve, Heather McDougall
Greg63 wrote:I have always have been heavy set, big boned, husky all of my life (i.e, overweight) , so I haven't a clue how much I really need to lose. Around Thanksgiving this year I was at my heaviest weight of 260 pounds at 6'1" (185cm). I think my lowest adult weight was 180, but I was still chubby. At the moment I think a fit, more muscular 190 would suit me, but I'll have to see how I feel/look when I get closer and adjust. So, I'll go with a even amount of 60 pounds as I started on Saturday at 252.8.
Cheers!
Greg
vgpedlr wrote:Greg63 wrote:I have always have been heavy set, big boned, husky all of my life (i.e, overweight) , so I haven't a clue how much I really need to lose. Around Thanksgiving this year I was at my heaviest weight of 260 pounds at 6'1" (185cm). I think my lowest adult weight was 180, but I was still chubby. At the moment I think a fit, more muscular 190 would suit me, but I'll have to see how I feel/look when I get closer and adjust. So, I'll go with a even amount of 60 pounds as I started on Saturday at 252.8.
Cheers!
Greg
Close. According to BMI charts, 190 lb swould put you at the lower end of the "overweight" range. A better goal would be 175 lbs.
In addition to periodically reviewing the MWL protocols, I HIGHLY recommend reading the threads on calorie density in Jeff's forum, as calorie density is the principle which makes MWL work. I also highly recommend getting Jeff's DVD on calorie density. It is the best explanation, full stop.
Good luck, and keep us posted.
vgpedlr wrote:Greg63 wrote:I have always have been heavy set, big boned, husky all of my life (i.e, overweight) , so I haven't a clue how much I really need to lose. Around Thanksgiving this year I was at my heaviest weight of 260 pounds at 6'1" (185cm). I think my lowest adult weight was 180, but I was still chubby. At the moment I think a fit, more muscular 190 would suit me, but I'll have to see how I feel/look when I get closer and adjust. So, I'll go with a even amount of 60 pounds as I started on Saturday at 252.8.
Cheers!
Greg
Close. According to BMI charts, 190 lb swould put you at the lower end of the "overweight" range. A better goal would be 175 lbs.
In addition to periodically reviewing the MWL protocols, I HIGHLY recommend reading the threads on calorie density in Jeff's forum, as calorie density is the principle which makes MWL work. I also highly recommend getting Jeff's DVD on calorie density. It is the best explanation, full stop.
Good luck, and keep us posted.
HappyLeo wrote:BMI charts are notoriously controversial b/c they don't take into account muscle mass, so you end up with extremely healthy, heavily muscled people in the "obese" category, which makes zero sense.
vgpedlr wrote:HappyLeo wrote:BMI charts are notoriously controversial b/c they don't take into account muscle mass, so you end up with extremely healthy, heavily muscled people in the "obese" category, which makes zero sense.
I am referring to BMI in the same context that Jeff does here, in regards to overall longevity. It may not matter as much what the mass consists of, just how much there is. Please see the threads on his forum for clarification.
Greg63 wrote:Thanks for welcome, HappyLeo. Are you keeping a journal here?
I have also read Jeff's posts on BMI in terms of longevity and it's interesting information. I've set an initial goal of 185 pounds and will re-evaluate as I meet or get close to it. I haven't been that weight for a very, very, very long time, so it's something to aim for, not to obsess over. Will take BMI as a factor, as well as body measurements, as factors. As long as I feel great and look great, I'll be happy.
Return to Maximum Weight Loss Program
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests