gracezw wrote:I am curious. He is reported to have “a mild heart attack.” Do we know whether he was a stable patient or an unstable one? I am studying the difference between the two groups. A stable patient can improve with McD’s diet; stenting may be unnecessary. An unstable patient may need stenting.
gracezw: He had a heat attack so by definition he was not stable. Stable patients are not having a heart attck. They just have pain in their chest or other symptoms when exerting.
Stenting is totally justified during heart attacks. The doctor opens up the blocked artery and saves the heart muscle from dying. An absolute life saver.
I don't know but by a mild heart attack they probably mean that it was non STEMI (An ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a serious form of heart attack in which a coronary artery is completely blocked and a large part of the heart muscle is unable to receive blood. “ST segment elevation” refers to a pattern that shows up on an electrocardiogram (EKG).)
I think NSTEMI heart attack are serious also though may not lead to death. I believe a lot of heart muscle may still die if an NSTEMI is not treated quickly.
And if you had an NSTEMI, you are likely at a very high risk of the dreadful kind, the STEMI.
He was very lucky. I hope he knows he got a new life and makes changes in his diet. He must realize that the state of the art in cardiology is not going to save him.
I lost a good friend of mine and my family doctor to a STEMI a few months back. At the age of 48! What a great loss and unneeded. He was witness to my progress on this diet, but just had too much faith in the medical establishment. I hope Dr Warner realizes his mistakes and takes advantage of the chance he has been given. Many don't get that.