Moderators: JeffN, f1jim, John McDougall, carolve, Heather McDougall
I have since downloaded and all 10 videos, viewed about 5 of them. Based on the information presented so far and despite my qualms implied above, I now feel extremely fortunate to be too old to have been exposed to the plethera of modern vaccines and would never allow minors much less infants for whom I was responsible to be vaccinated. I've historically said No to all annual flu vacines even though I did not know the detailed arguements against them and will continue to do so. Curing the governmental cancer that is the CDC (Center for Disease Control) seems hopeless. I am not a family man, but if I were, long before I/we planned to have a new child in a state where infantile vaccination was mandatory, I/we would move to a different state.calvin wrote:At about 1hr 35min of episode 9, this doctor reveals himself as an advocate of high-dietary-fat-induced ketosis as key to detox...Low Carb, High Fad = The Ketogenic Dietbbq wrote:FYI - here's the link to watch episode 9 until its expiration:
http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/episode-9-watch-now/
Robert De Niro and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are announcing something big tomorrow concerning vaccines and mercury.
The live press conference event begins at 9:25 AM EST on Wednesday, Feb. 15 at the National Press Club in Washington D.C.
The entire event will be live streamed so click HERE to watch live.
If you cannot attend the live stream, the recording will be made available HERE STARTING AT 10:00 AM EST.
Either way, we hope you'll take a moment to watch the event.
Helpinghands wrote:The years before the Polio vaccine was invented there were 50,000 new cases of Polio every year. The year after most kids were vaccinated there were 50 new cases.
Thrasymachus wrote:Helpinghands wrote:The years before the Polio vaccine was invented there were 50,000 new cases of Polio every year. The year after most kids were vaccinated there were 50 new cases.
I have read that they simply changed the definition of polio. For example my uncle has multiple sclerosis. As I understand it in the past, it simply would have been said he had polio as few were diagnosed as having sclerosis and similar disease like Parkinsons, meningitis, Epstein Bar, etc. and instead they tended to be classified as having polio. But they changed definitions and criteria after the vaccine was introduced. For cancer they define survival rate as living for a short term period of 5 years after diagnosis and if you die 5 years later, you can be defined as having a positive survival rate.
Needless to say Pharmaceutical interests and medical equipment manufacturers that set the tone for allopathic medicine, frame issues to make it look their over-priced interventions are much more effective than they really are.
Helpinghands wrote:The years before the Polio vaccine was invented there were 50,000 new cases of Polio every year. The year after most kids were vaccinated there were 50 new cases.
The majority’s decision today disturbs that careful balance based on a bare policy preference that it is better “to leave complex epidemiological judgments about vaccine design to the FDA and the National Vaccine Program rather than juries.”
Later, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” – Bruesewitz v.Wyeth LLC, 131 S. Ct. 1068, 179 L. Ed. 2d 1 (2011). At the same time (the hand quicker than the eye), the same high court also affirmed that drug companies should be vaccinated against state civil liability lawsuits filed by vaccine-injured children or the survivors of those children killed or injured by vaccines. The so-called “vaccine court” remains a possible avenue of compensation, but 80% of the cases filed there are turned back by the court, which is not really a court at all but a shadowy government tribunal unaccountable to the light of constitutional law.
At the same time there are clear signs that the relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and state regulatory agencies is getting even closer. For example, the industry has been required to pay most of the cost of funding of regulatory agencies – a 100% funding for the MHRA since 1989, with similar trends in the EU (70% funding) and the USA (50% funding) since the mid-1990s. In return it has seen a significant reduction in the regulatory review times for new patentable drugs, which have tumbled by half in the USA since 1993, with similar dramatic falls evident in Europe (Abraham 2009b: 60).
parnold wrote:d
I just finished watching it, and although I have personally been ANTI-vaccine for a while now (because of what I've studied), this series confirmed, beyond "any" doubt, my position on it!
-- http://VaccinesRevealed.com
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests