zumacraig wrote:Your tax dollars are not paying for poor people to go to Disney World! They are paying for wars and corporate subsidies!
In the federal budget, income transfers through Social Security and welfare exceed spending on defense by $522 billion. (And $161 billion of what's called defense spending, 21 percent of defense spending, is actually spending on veterans.) Defense spending is 21 percent of the federal budget.
Corporate welfare totals $100 billion if one counts very generously. That's about 7 percent of what's spent on income transfers. It's 26 percent of what the federal government spends on what is technically classified as "welfare."
Our tax dollars are going to pay for defense and corporate welfare; one of those should be ended, and the other is one of the three legitimate functions of government. Welfare for individuals is not a legitimate function of government, and that too should be ended. More of our tax dollars are going out in transfers to people, including welfare, than to both defense and corporate welfare combined.
zumacraig wrote:And this age of entitlement narrative needs to end.
When the growth of "entitlements" ends, maybe we can end the narrative. The narrative is real.
zumacraig wrote:We have to work together so that all have food, shelter, medical care. The capitalist way is not working. There is no rational reason we should be fighting for abundant resources.
The capitalist way is the only way to actually provide food, shelter, and medical care, and to rationally allocate resources. Resources are not only abundant, but scarce. Scarcity is not a myth or illusion, and the notion that it is is not secret wisdom but ignorance in abundance. Resources require work to create and turn to use--they are not free and laying out. You say "there's no reason we should be fighting for abundant resources." In one sense, you're right--we should not fight for them, but instead use the price system to allocate resources. But you actually mean that capitalism is "fighting for resources." It's not--it is government, socialist allocation that is a fight for resources, and is the method of resource allocation by violence; it also ends up massively wasting resources, as socialist economies have proven abundantly.
You said that there's evidence that most wealthy people either inherited their wealth, are criminals, or just lucky. Really? What's the evidence? Most wealthy people, the great majority, are recently wealthy--they did not inherit their wealth, but developed something that people want. The areas of the country that were dependent on slave labor were the poorest areas--slavery actually destroyed wealth. The notion that the wealthy are in general criminals is too stupid to bother refuting, and as it's offered only as an arbitrary claim with no substance supporting it, that's just as well.