Favorite
Five
My Favorite Five Articles Found in Recent Medical Journals
Dairy
Fails Children’s Bones
Calcium,
dairy products, and bone health in children and young
adults: a reevaluation of the evidence
by Amy Joy
Lanou published in the March 2005 issue of the medical
journal Pediatrics found, “Neither increased
consumption of dairy products, specifically, nor total
dietary calcium consumption has shown even a modestly
consistent benefit for child or young adult bone health.”
A Medline search for articles on the effects of dairy
products on children’s bone health revealed 58 studies that
caused the authors to conclude, “Scant evidence supports
nutrition guidelines focused specifically on increasing milk
or other dairy product intake for promoting child and
adolescent bone mineralization.”
COMMENTS:
The dairy
industry spends at least $166 million a year on “scientific”
research and related efforts to convince you, your
children’s teachers, and your doctors that “milk builds
strong bones.” Even with all that money their efforts fail
when unbiased scientists closely look at the literature, as
did Dr. Lanou. Look around the world and notice that other
children (and adults) grow normal skeletons without cow’s
milk. If cow’s milk meant better bone health, then you
would not find non-milk-drinking people from Asia, Africa,
and people from the Middle East having stronger bones and
less osteoporosis. The daily calcium intake of these mostly
vegetarian people is 300 to 500 mg – far less than the
propaganda from the dairy industry telling us to consume
1500 to 2000 mg daily. (See my April 2003 newsletter article
“Dairy Products – 10 False Promises.”)
The human
intestine is capable of absorbing all the calcium necessary
for bone growth and maintenance from starches, vegetables
and fruits – and it never fails to do this in natural living
conditions. I can say this for sure because “dietary
calcium deficiency” does not exist. In other words, no one
has ever developed a disease due to too little calcium in
the food supply – ever!
You say,
“But osteoporosis is due to a low-calcium diet.” No
reputable scientist would make that claim. Osteoporosis is
due to long-term bone disease caused by the American diet.
The acid and protein from the meat and dairy products damage
the bone tissues, thus causing calcium and other bone
materials to be lost through the kidneys. Deficiencies of
vitamins, minerals, and other plant-food-derived nutrients
further contribute to the deterioration of the bones. This
is why the heaviest consumers of milk and meat in the world
– Americans and Europeans – have the weakest, sickest bones.
Weak bones
are not the only consequence of profit-motivated dishonesty.
The dairy industry’s lies lead to disabling and painful
childhood diseases, like type-1 diabetes, juvenile
rheumatoid arthritis, obesity, type-2 diabetes, and
constipation – to name a few of the well-researched health
hazards. (See my May 2003 newsletter article “Marketing Milk
and Disease.”)
Unfortunately, this one ray of truth shed by Dr. Lanou will
be lost in the hundreds of millions of dollars of “spin” set
forth by the dairy industry through advertisements and
school marketing campaigns. Begin correcting this source of
malnutrition at home by getting milk and cheese out of your
family’s diet. Of all the “four basic food groups,” the
dairy products are the most harmful – and eliminating them
would do more for the health of children worldwide than even
ridding their diets of the meat products and sugar-laden
soft drinks (which must go next).
Lanou AJ,
Berkow SE, Barnard ND. Calcium, dairy products, and bone
health in children and young adults: a reevaluation of the
evidence. Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):736-43.
Fish Can
Cause You Heart Disease
Mercury,
fish oils, and risk of acute coronary events and
cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and
all-cause mortality in men in eastern Finland
by Jyrki Virtanen in the January 2005 issue of
Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology found,
“High content of mercury in hair may be a risk factor for
acute coronary events and CVD (vascular disease), CHD (heart
disease), and all-cause mortality in middle-aged eastern
Finnish men. Mercury may also attenuate the protective
effects of fish on cardiovascular health.” More
specifically, the high mercury content negated the
so-called, protective effects of the “good” fish fats (like
DHA, DPA, and EPA) on the blood vessels and heart.
The toxic
metal mercury comes to us mainly from eating fish.
Comment:
Fish is
promoted as health food, a preventative for heart disease,
and the only “safe meat” to eat. Here is a case of a little
bit of truth being blown way out of proportion. Fish fats
(omega-3 fats) will thin the blood and make the formation of
a potentially fatal blood clot in your heart artery less
likely. (Remember, the sudden formation of a blood clot –
thrombus – in one of your heart arteries is the cause of a
heart attack – coronary artery thrombosis).
The
problem is, mercury causes the blood to clot. Furthermore,
the mercury is a powerful oxidant, producing free radicals,
which damage your arteries. Fish muscle is inherently high
in cholesterol, so eating it causes your blood cholesterol
to rise. In this study by Jyrki Virtanen, those people with
the higher amounts of mercury in their hair (indicating more
consumption of fish) also had higher total cholesterol and
LDL “bad” cholesterol levels, and higher rates of
hypertension and diabetes.
This is
the second major study to show this important health hazard
of fish-eating. An earlier study, published in the New
England Journal of Medicine in 2002, found that higher
levels of mercury in toenail clippings predicted a greater
chance of future heart attacks.2 (Nails and hair
accumulate mercury and provide evidence of long-term
accumulation in the body.)
Environmental mercury is a major pollutant from industry.
The toxic form, methylmercury, is accumulated and
concentrated in the food chain. Because fish are near the
top of the food chain they have very high concentrations of
this poison. At very top of the food chain are fish-eating
people (and, even higher up, their breast-feeding infants).
Almost all of the mercury consumed is efficiently absorbed
by our intestinal tract. Since our bodies have no way of
excreting this toxin, mercury continues to accumulate
throughout life, exerting its detrimental effects.
The final
statements of the authors are worth noticing, “In
conclusion, this prospective population-based study shows
that high mercury content in hair is associated with
increased risk of acute coronary events and CVD, CHD, and
all-cause mortality, and that the beneficial effects of fish
oils on the risk are negated by high mercury content in
hair. Does this mean that contrary to the current
recommendations for a healthy diet, we should not eat fish?
No, but we should vary the type of fish we eat
(plankton-eating, fatty fish is usually low in mercury,
although it may contain other lipid-soluble environmental
pollutants) and avoid regular intake of large fish from
lakes with known high mercury content.”
This is
another case of scientists’ personal eating habits getting
in the way of their judgment and honest recommendations for
the public. The
truth is: eating fish will give you a heart attack, not
prevent one – and they should have the integrity to say so.
And to tell the public that the least
amount of environmental mercury is found in foods low on the
food chain – a diet of starches, vegetables and fruits.
This same diet is also proven to prevent heart attacks and
reverse the underlying mechanisms causing heart attacks –
atherosclerosis and thrombosis.
You can
read more about these subjects in my newsletter archive
articles found at www.drmcdougall.com. See August 2004:
A Cesspool
of Pollutants – Now Is the Time to Clean-up Your Body; and
February 2003 – Fish Is Not Health Food.
1)
Virtanen JK, Voutilainen S, Rissanen TH, Mursu J, Tuomainen
TP, Korhonen MJ, Valkonen VP, Seppanen K, Laukkanen JA,
Salonen JT. Mercury, fish oils, and risk of acute coronary
events and cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease,
and all-cause mortality in men in eastern Finland.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005 Jan;25(1):228-33.
2)
Guallar E, Sanz-Gallardo MI, van't Veer P, Bode P, Aro A,
Gomez-Aracena J, Kark JD, Riemersma RA, Martin-Moreno JM,
Kok FJ; Heavy Metals and Myocardial Infarction Study Group.
Mercury, fish oils, and the risk of myocardial infarction.
N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 28;347(22):1747-54.
Meat Can
Cause You Colon Cancer
Meat
consumption and risk of colorectal cancer
by Ann Chao in the January 12, 2005 issue of the Journal
of the American Medical Association found a high intake
of red and processed meat was associated with higher risk of
colon cancer. This study included 148,610 adults, residing
in 21 states in the USA. These people provided information
on their meat consumption in 1982, and again in 1992/1993.
Those eating more red meat had more cancer in the last part
of their colon.
Comment:
In 1950, Ernst Wynder, the
founder of the American Health Foundation (a research
institute) and the journal Preventive Medicine
wrote an article in the Journal of American Medicine
which clearly linked smoking to lung cancer – the American
Medical Association called this "landmark research." In
1968, Dr. Wynder told me about his experiences with
“man-made” cancers, during one of our private
conversations: “I went to my colleagues in the 1950s and
explained to them that smoking cigarettes causes lung
cancer. Their response was, ‘How could that be?’ I said,
‘You suck toxic smoke into your lungs and you get cancer’
and they were amazed. Then in the 1960s I told my
colleagues that eating meat causes colon cancer and their
response was, ‘How could that be?’ I said, ‘You put toxic
foods – like red meat – in your colon, and you get cancer.’
They were dumbfounded.”
Diseases
of the intestine have been blamed on everything from
emotions to viruses, but the most obvious – what you put
into your bowels through your mouth – has too often been
overlooked. Colon cancer is due to years of exposing the
cells of the large intestine to partially digested remnants
of the Western diet, and especially red meat. Colon cancer
is a very unpleasant way to die – those interested in
staying out of the hospital and being healthy will fill
their intestines with unrefined plants foods.
Chao A,
Thun MJ, Connell CJ, McCullough ML, Jacobs EJ, Flanders WD,
Rodriguez C, Sinha R, Calle EE. Meat consumption and risk
of colorectal cancer.
JAMA. 2005 Jan 12;293(2):172-82.
Fast Food
Makes People Fat and Diabetic – Duh!
Fast-food
habits, weight gain, and insulin resistance (the CARDIA
study): 15-year prospective analysis
by Mark Pereira in the January 1, 2005 issue of the
Lancet found, “Fast-food consumption has strong positive
associations with weight gain and insulin resistance,
suggesting that fast food increases the risk of obesity and
type 2 diabetes.” For 15 years, 5115 people were studied.
Those eating fast food frequently weighed 4.5 Kg (10 pounds)
more, and had twice the incidence of insulin resistance – a
forerunner to type-2 diabetes – than those rarely partaking
in these instant indulgences.
Comment:
People are getting fatter and sicker and the fast food
industry is making their downhill journey to suffering,
illness, and earlier death quicker and easier. Over 65% of
adults and 25% of children are now overweight in the USA.
The fast food system for feeding the masses started in the
1950s and has become a way of life for many people living in
developed countries. Exaggerated portion size and
unhealthful ingredients characterize this fare. For more
information on diabetes see my February 2004 newsletter
article: Type-2 Diabetes – the Expected Adaptation to Overnutrition.
The
findings of this article were recently broadcast
entertainingly in the movie, Super
Size Me.
The star of this documentary, Morgan Spurlock, ate
McDonald’s meals for every meal for a month, and not
surprisingly, gained 12 Kg (24.5 pounds) and became ill with
headaches, depression, exhaustion, and loss of sexual
function. No one should be surprised by the findings of
this study or Spurlock’s blockbuster movie. So why do
people continue to act contrary and destructively? Grease
and salt don’t taste good enough to die for.
Pereira
MA, Kartashov AI, Ebbeling CB, Van Horn L, Slattery ML,
Jacobs DR Jr, Ludwig DS. Fast-food habits, weight gain, and
insulin resistance (the CARDIA study): 15-year prospective
analysis. Lancet. 2005 Jan 1;365(9453):36-42.
Don’t
Exercise – Until after You Have Changed Your Diet
Effects of
exercise training and deconditioning on platelet aggregation
induced by alternating shear stress in men
by Jong-Shyan Wang in the January 2005 issue of
Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology found
reasons why the risk of a cardiac arrest increases during
vigorous exercise in people who begin in poor physical
condition. This risk may be due to an increased tendency
for the blood to clot (increased platelet aggregation and
decreased fibrinolysis) caused by physical trama to the
blood elements from intense exercise. Fortunately, regular
exercise, and the improved physical condition that follows,
decreases the tendency for blood clot formation and reduces
the risk of a heart attack.
Comment:
Nathan
Pritikin, one of the pioneers in low-fat diet and heart
disease, used to warn people not to start exercising until
after they had changed their diet. Results of this study
shed more scientific light on why people need to adhere to
this advice. For more than 50 years scientific research has
demonstrated that a healthy, low-fat diet will dramatically
reduce the tendency for the platelets to aggregate and the
blood to clot. Thus, the risk of precipitating a heart
attack is reduced or eliminated when diet and exercise are
introduced in proper order. Start your exercise program
slowly. A good guide to the intensity of activity would be
for you to be able to converse (talk) comfortably with a
friend while exercising (not be out of breath).
Wang JS,
Li YS, Chen JC, Chen YW. Effects of exercise training and
deconditioning on platelet aggregation induced by
alternating shear stress in men.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005 Feb;25(2):454-60.
 |